
.jpg)
A.I.
Artificial Intelligence
​Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to computer systems that can perform tasks traditionally requiring human intelligence, such as learning, problem-solving, and decision-making. AI systems learn from data and adapt to new situations, mimicking human cognitive abilities. This technology has wide-ranging applications, from digital assistants like Siri and Alexa to self-driving cars and medical diagnosis, according to Britannica and Wikipedia.
Key aspects of AI:
-
Learning:
AI systems can learn from data and improve their performance over time.
​
-
Adaptation:
AI can adapt to new inputs and situations without being explicitly programmed, according to Built In.
​
-
Task performance:
AI can perform tasks such as speech recognition, image recognition, and natural language processing.
​
-
Types of AI:
-
Weak AI (Narrow AI): AI designed for a specific task, like a digital assistant.
-
​
-
Strong AI (General AI): AI with the ability to perform a wide range of tasks at a human level, currently theoretical.
​
-
Applications:
-
Digital Assistants: Siri and Alexa
-
​
-
Self-Driving Cars: Tesla's self-driving vehicles
​
-
Medical Diagnosis: according to Wikipedia
​
-
Fraud Detection: according to SAS
​

Potential Benefits Of AI
Artificial intelligence (AI) offers numerous potential benefits, including enhanced productivity, improved decision-making, and the automation of repetitive tasks. AI can also contribute to scientific discoveries, climate change mitigation, and even improve customer service. Additionally, AI can help to identify patterns in large datasets, leading to more informed decisions and increased efficiency.
Here's a more detailed look at some of the potential benefits:
AI can automate repetitive tasks, freeing up human workers to focus on more complex and creative work. This can lead to increased efficiency and productivity across various industries.
​
AI algorithms can analyze vast amounts of data to identify patterns and trends, providing valuable insights for decision-making. This can lead to more accurate and timely decisions, particularly in complex areas like finance or healthcare.
​
AI can be used to automate a wide range of repetitive tasks, such as data entry, scheduling, and even basic customer inquiries. This can save time and resources, allowing employees to focus on more strategic activities.
​
AI can accelerate scientific research by analyzing large datasets and identifying patterns that might be missed by humans. This can lead to new discoveries in various fields, including medicine, materials science, and drug development.
​
AI can help to develop more efficient energy systems, optimize resource management, and predict climate change impacts. This can contribute to a more sustainable future.
​
AI-powered chatbots and virtual assistants can provide 24/7 customer support, personalize customer experiences, and improve customer satisfaction.
​
AI can be used to diagnose diseases, personalize treatment plans, and develop new drugs. This can lead to better patient outcomes and improve healthcare access.
​
AI can drive innovation, create new industries, and increase productivity, contributing to overall economic growth.
​
AI can be used to optimize crop yields, improve pest control, and enhance food security.
​
AI can be used to detect and prevent cyberattacks, protect sensitive data, and improve overall cybersecurity.
​
AI can be used to develop self-driving cars, optimize traffic flow, and improve transportation efficiency.
​
AI can make knowledge and information more accessible to everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status.
​
Benefits and Advantages of AI in Cybersecurity
Understanding the benefits of AI technology at an individual level facilitates the transition from traditional, often reactive, security measures to dynamic, proactive, and intelligent solutions.
The most expansive benefit of AI in cybersecurity is its ability to analyze vast amounts of content and deliver insights that allow security teams to quickly and effectively detect and mitigate risk. This core capability drives many of the benefits provided by AI technology.
Following are some of the key advantages of using artificial intelligence in cybersecurity.
Enhanced Threat Detection
Incorporating AI into cybersecurity helps to identify threats more quickly, accurately, and efficiently. This makes an organization's digital infrastructure more resilient and reduces the risk of cyberattacks. AI technology offers several security enhancements, such as:
-
Understanding suspicious or malicious activity in context to prioritize responses
-
Customizing security protocols based on specific organizational requirements and individual user behavior
-
Detecting fraud using advanced, specialized AI algorithms
-
Detecting potential threats in near real-time to expedite response and minimize their impact.
Proactive Defense
AI-powered technology is at the core of proactive cybersecurity defense. By processing inputs from all applicable data sources, AI systems can automate a preemptive response to mitigate potential risk in near real-time. The types of AI technology that enable this are:
-
Automation to speed up the defensive response
-
Machine learning to benefit from knowledge of the tactics and techniques used in past cyberattacks
-
Pattern recognition to identify anomalies
Predictive Analysis
Predictive analysis is a technique that uses AI technology, specifically machine learning algorithms. These algorithms analyze information to find patterns and identify specific risk factors and threats. The machine learning models created from this analysis provide insights that can help security teams predict a future cyber attack.
Artificial intelligence capabilities in predictive analysis include analyzing historical data sets, recognizing patterns, and dynamically incorporating new content into machine learning models. By predicting a potential cyber attack, security teams can take preemptive steps to mitigate risk.
Reduced False Positives
Cybersecurity solutions are integrating artificial intelligence to reduce false alarms. Advanced AI algorithms and machine learning capabilities identify patterns in network behavior far more accurately than traditional rule-based systems.
This reduces the burden on human analysts, stopping legitimate activities from being flagged as threats. AI technology helps security teams contextualize and differentiate between typical anomalies and actual threats, reducing alert fatigue and optimizing their workload. It also minimizes the drain on resources.
Continuous Learning
AI is continuously learning and evolving to reduce the risk and impact of cyberattacks. Unlike static security systems, AI-powered cybersecurity technology adapts and learns as new security content becomes available, resulting in ongoing improvements and enhanced effectiveness.
Reinforcement learning, a specialized type of machine learning that trains an algorithm to learn from its environment, is used to ensure optimal results. With continuous learning, security teams can anticipate new patterns, techniques, and tactics cyber criminals use, improve predictive analysis accuracy over time, and optimize security defenses to stay ahead of evolving threats.

Potential Threats And Dangers Of AI
​
15 Potential AI Risks
-
Automation-spurred job loss : The advent of AI has revolutionized how tasks are performed, especially repetitive tasks. While this technological advancement enhances efficiency, it also comes with a downside – job loss. Millions of jobs are at stake as machines take over human roles, igniting concerns about economic inequality and the urgent need for skill set evolution. Advocates of automation platforms argue that AI technology will generate more job opportunities than it will eliminate. Yet, even if this holds true, the transition could be tumultuous for many. It raises questions about how displaced workers will adjust, especially those lacking the means to learn new skills. Therefore, proactive measures such as worker retraining programs and policy changes are necessary to ensure a smooth transition into an increasingly automated future.
-
Deepfakes : Deepfakes, a portmanteau of “deep learning” and “fake,” refer to artificial intelligence’s capability of creating convincing fake images, videos, and audio recordings. This technology’s potential misuse for spreading misinformation or malicious content poses a grave threat to the trustworthiness of digital media. As a result, there is a growing demand for tools and regulations that can accurately detect and control deepfakes. However, this has also led to an ongoing arms race between those who create deepfakes and those who seek to expose them. The implications of deepfakes extend beyond mere misinformation, potentially causing harm to individuals’ reputations, influencing political discourse, and even threatening national security. Thus, developing robust detection techniques and legal frameworks to combat the misuse of deepfake technology is paramount.
-
Privacy Violations : AI systems often require enormous amounts of data to function optimally, raising significant privacy concerns. These concerns range from potential data breaches and misuse of personal data to intrusive surveillance. For instance, AI-powered facial recognition technology can be misused to track individuals without consent, infringing on their privacy rights. As AI becomes more integrated into our daily lives, the risk of misusing or mishandling personal data increases. These risks underscore the need for robust data protection measures and regulations. Policymakers, technologists, and privacy advocates must work together to establish stringent privacy standards, secure data handling practices, and effective legal frameworks to protect individuals’ privacy rights in an AI-driven world.
-
Algorithmic bias caused by bad data : An algorithm is only as good as the data it’s trained on. If the training data is biased, it will inevitably lead to biased outcomes. This issue is evident in various sectors like recruitment, criminal justice, and credit scoring, where AI systems have been found to discriminate against certain groups. For example, an AI hiring tool might inadvertently favor male candidates if it’s trained mostly on resumes from men. Such biases can reinforce existing social inequalities and lead to unfair treatment. To address this, researchers are working to make AI algorithms fairer and more transparent. This includes techniques for auditing algorithms, improving the diversity of the data ecosystem, and designing algorithms that are aware of and can correct for their own biases.
-
Socioeconomic inequality : While AI holds immense potential for societal advancement, there’s a risk that its benefits will primarily accrue to those who are already well-off, thereby exacerbating socioeconomic inequality. Those with wealth and resources are better positioned to capitalize on AI advancements, while disadvantaged groups may face job loss or other negative impacts. Policymakers must ensure that the benefits of AI are distributed equitably. This could involve investing in education and training programs to help disadvantaged groups adapt to the changing job market, implementing policies to prevent AI-driven discrimination, and promoting the development and use of AI applications that specifically benefit marginalized groups. Taking such steps can help ensure that AI is a tool for social progress rather than a driver of inequality.
-
Danger to humans : AI systems, particularly those designed to interact with the physical world, can pose safety risks to humans. Autonomous vehicles, for example, could cause accidents if they malfunction or fail to respond appropriately to unexpected situations. Similarly, robots used in manufacturing or healthcare could harm humans if they make errors or operate in unanticipated ways. To mitigate these risks, rigorous safety testing and standards are needed. These should take into account not only the system’s performance under normal conditions but also its behavior in edge cases and failure modes. Furthermore, a system of accountability should be established to ensure that any harm caused by AI systems can be traced back to the responsible parties. This will incentivize manufacturers to prioritize safety and provide victims with recourse in the event of an accident.
-
Unclear legal regulation : AI is an evolving field, and legal regulations often struggle to keep pace. This lag can lead to uncertainty and potential misuse of AI, with laws and regulations failing to adequately address new challenges posed by AI technologies. For instance, who is liable when an autonomous vehicle causes an accident? How should intellectual property rights apply to AI-generated works? How can we protect privacy in the age of AI-powered surveillance? Policymakers worldwide are grappling with these and other questions as they strive to regulate AI effectively and ethically. They must strike a balance between fostering innovation and protecting individuals and society from potential harm. This will likely require ongoing dialogue among technologists, legal experts, ethicists, and other stakeholders and a willingness to revise laws and regulations as the technology evolves.
-
Social manipulation : AI’s ability to analyze vast amounts of data and make predictions about people’s behavior can be exploited for social manipulation. This could involve using AI to deliver personalized advertising or political propaganda to influence people’s opinions or behavior. Such manipulation can undermine democratic processes and individual autonomy, leading to ethical concerns. For instance, the scandal involving Cambridge Analytica and Facebook revealed how personal data can be used to manipulate voters’ opinions. To guard against such manipulation, we need safeguards such as transparency requirements for online advertising, regulations on using personal data for political purposes, and public education about how AI can be used for manipulation. Additionally, individuals should be empowered with tools and knowledge to control how their data is used and critically evaluate online information.
-
Invasion of privacy and social grading : AI has the potential to intrude on personal privacy and enable social grading. For example, AI systems can analyze social media activity, financial transactions, and other personal data to generate a “social score” for each individual. This score could then be used to make decisions about the individual, such as whether they qualify for a loan or get a job offer. This practice raises serious concerns about privacy and fairness. On one hand, such systems could potentially improve decision-making by providing more accurate assessments of individuals. On the other hand, they could lead to discrimination, invasion of privacy, and undue pressure to conform to societal norms. Strict data privacy laws and regulations are needed to address these concerns to govern personal data collection, storage, and use. Furthermore, individuals should be able to access, correct, and control their personal data.
-
Misalignment between our goals and AI’s goals : AI systems are designed to achieve specific goals, which their human creators define. However, if the goals of the AI system are not perfectly aligned with those of the humans, this can lead to problems. For instance, a trading algorithm might be programmed to maximize profits. But if it does so by making risky trades that endanger the company’s long-term viability, this would be a misalignment of goals. Similarly, an AI assistant programmed to keep its user engaged might end up encouraging harmful behaviors if engagement is measured in terms of time spent interacting with the device. Careful thought must be given to define AI’s goals and measure its success to avoid such misalignments. This should include considering potential unintended consequences and implementing safeguards to prevent harmful outcomes.
-
A lack of transparency : Many AI systems operate as “black boxes,” making decisions in ways that humans can’t easily understand or explain. This lack of transparency can lead to mistrust and make it difficult to hold AI systems accountable. For example, if an AI system denies a person a loan or a job, the person has a right to know why. However, if the decision-making process is too complex to explain, this could leave the person feeling frustrated and unfairly treated. To address this issue, research is being conducted into “explainable AI” – AI systems that can provide understandable explanations for their decisions.This involves technical advancements and policy measures such as transparency requirements. By making AI more transparent, we can build trust in these systems and ensure they are used responsibly and fairly.
-
Loss of control : As AI systems become more powerful and autonomous, there is a risk that humans could lose control over them. This could happen gradually, as we delegate more decisions and tasks to AI, or suddenly, if an AI system were to go rogue. Both scenarios raise serious concerns. In the gradual scenario, we might find ourselves overly dependent on AI, unable to function without it, and vulnerable to any failures or biases in AI systems. In a sudden scenario, an out-of-control AI could cause catastrophic damage before humans could intervene. It’s vital to incorporate stringent security procedures and supervisory structures to steer clear of these situations. This includes building “off-switches” into AI systems, setting clear boundaries on AI behavior, and conducting rigorous testing to ensure that AI systems behave as intended, even in extreme or unexpected situations.
-
Introducing program bias into decision-making : Bias in AI systems can stem from the data they’re trained on and the way they’re programmed If an AI is programmed with certain biases, whether consciously or unconsciously, it can lead to unfair decision-making.For example, if an AI system used in hiring is programmed to value certain qualifications over others, it might unfairly disadvantage candidates who are equally capable but have different backgrounds. Such bias can reinforce existing social inequalities and undermine the fairness and credibility of AI-driven decisions. A commitment to ethical principles, input from diverse perspectives, and technical expertise are required in AI development. These tools help us critically examine our assumptions and biases and consider their potential influence on the AI systems we build, which is essential to avoid potential pitfalls.
-
Data sourcing and violation of personal privacy : AI often requires large amounts of personal data to function effectively. However, the collection, storage, and use of such data can lead to violations of personal privacy if not properly managed. For instance, an AI system might collect data about a person’s online behavior to personalize their user experience, but in doing so, it could expose sensitive information about the person or make them feel uncomfortably watched. Strong data governance practices and privacy protections are needed to address these concerns. These should include clear policies on what data is collected and how it’s used, robust security measures to prevent data breaches, and transparency measures to inform individuals about how their data is handled. Furthermore, individuals should have the right to control their personal data, including opting out of data collection or deleting it.
-
Techno-solutionism : There’s a tendency to view AI as a panacea that can solve all our problems. This belief, known as techno-solutionism, can lead to over-reliance on technology and neglect of other important factors. For instance, while AI can help us analyze data and make predictions, it can’t replace the need for human judgment, ethical considerations, and societal engagement in decision-making. Moreover, not all problems are best solved by technology; many require social, political, or behavioral changes. Therefore, while we should embrace the potential of AI, we should also be wary of techno-solutionism. We should consider the broader context in which AI is used, recognize its limitations, and ensure that it’s used in a way that complements, rather than supplants, other approaches to problem-solving. By doing so, we can harness the power of AI while also addressing the complex, multifaceted nature of the challenges we face.
​
Risks and Disadvantages of AI in Cybersecurity
AI technology has many benefits for cybersecurity, but its safety concerns security professionals. The potential risks introduced by AI technology need to be understood.
The integration of AI technology into cybersecurity strategies faces many issues. Some of these are due to the characteristics of AI technology, such as a need for more transparency and questions about data quality. Biases or inaccuracies in the content feeds used to train an algorithm can impact security decision-making.
This can lead to misleading results for AI algorithms and machine learning models. These are commonly cited concerns that highlight these issues. To avoid these risks, it is essential that the training data used by AI algorithms and machine learning models is diverse and unbiased.
Vulnerability to AI Attacks
AI-powered cybersecurity solutions depend heavily on data to feed machine learning and AI algorithms. Because of this, security teams have expressed concern about threat actors injecting malicious content to compromise defenses. In this case, an algorithm could be manipulated to allow attackers to evade defenses.
In addition, AI technology could create hard-to-detect threats, such as AI-powered phishing attacks. Another concern related to AI being used offensively is malware being combined with AI technology that can learn from an organization’s cyber defense systems and create or find vulnerabilities.
Privacy Concerns
AI in cybersecurity is a particular area of concern because of the many U.S. and international laws and regulations that all have strict rules about data privacy and how sensitive information can be collected, processed, and used. AI-powered cybersecurity tools gather information from various sources, and in the collection efforts, they commonly scoop up sensitive information. With threat actors targeting systems for this information, these data stores are at risk for cyberattacks and data breaches.
Also, using AI technology to identify risk factors from large data sets, including private communications, user behavior, and other sensitive information, can result in compliance violations due to the risk of misuse or unauthorized access.
Dependence on AI
Relying too much on AI can create a cybersecurity skills gap as people depend more on technology than their intelligence. This can lead to security teams becoming complacent, as they assume that AI systems will detect any potential threats. To avoid this, it's important to remember that human intelligence is still crucial in maintaining security.
Human experts bring a unique perspective to threat hunting and threat detection. Unfortunately, some organizations try to replace human intelligence with AI technology, which can harm overall security.
Ethical Dilemmas
The use of AI in cybersecurity raises additional ethical issues. When considering risk factors related to ethical concerns, AI bias and the lack of transparency are the two that often come up.
AI bias and lack of transparency can lead to unfair targeting and discrimination of specific users or groups. This can result in misidentification as an insider threat, causing irreparable harm.
Cost of Implementation
Incorporating AI technology into cybersecurity can be expensive and require a lot of resources, including limited human expertise to set up, deploy, and manage the AI systems.
Additionally, AI-powered solutions may need specialized hardware, supporting infrastructure, and significant processing capacity and power to run complex computations. Although the benefits of utilizing AI in cybersecurity are undeniable, organizations must have a comprehensive understanding of the expenses involved to avoid unpleasant surprises.
​
Lack of Transparency
Transparency is at the heart of all worries about the threats of AI. When technology has a mind of its own (at least to some degree), the lines of accountability and responsibility get fuzzy. Where does AI get its information? How do we know it’s reliable? What protections are in place to prevent misinformation or abuse? These questions — and more — are crucial for building a safe foundation for using AI technology.
The impetus is, of course, on companies creating AI models to be open about the algorithms behind their tools and the data used to train them. And they should participate in public dialog and support initiatives to implement appropriate security measures.
Ultimately, though, the impetus is on all citizens to push for adequate AI legislation to ensure tech companies put human interests before profits. The European AI Act is a good example of how the law can address these concerns, and some states are even following suit, such as California’s proposed AI regulations.
​
AI Bias
Although AI can “think” and function somewhat independently, it’s ultimately shaped by its creators — humans. And that means human biases and stereotypes are often reflected or even amplified in AI tools. This is one of the biggest risks of artificial intelligence.
There have certainly been newsworthy examples of bias in AI technology — from hiring inequities in employment screening tools to higher error rates for racial minorities with facial recognition software. These biases are often unintentional, based merely on the data used to train the system.
Nonetheless, avoiding AI bias requires a deliberate focus on providing unbiased data sets and creating impartial algorithms. Numerous studies have been done in this arena, and more are in progress to help developers better address bias issues.
​
Physical, Social, and Emotional Harm
One of the biggest perceived AI risks is its potential to do direct harm. AI-powered self-driving cars, for example, have been involved in some fatal crashes — though studies have shown autonomous vehicles are actually safer than those controlled by human drivers.
Besides physical harm, many people worry about the ill effects on society as a whole. The AI-driven spread of fake news has been well documented, and deepfakes have already been weaponized for political gain. Some chatbots have even seemed to encourage users to commit suicide when prompted.
These potential negative effects of AI are serious and not to be downplayed. Tech companies and legislators must work together to set up proper safety protocols before new technology is rolled out. Users, meanwhile, should also take steps to use AI tools safely by thinking critically and protecting personal information.
It’s also crucial to counteract these fears by considering the many potential benefits AI brings to the table. Gains in productivity, more equitable information access, and deeper analytics capabilities can all bring real advantages to individuals and society — as long as the technology is leveraged responsibly and carefully.
​
Loss of Jobs
Job insecurity in the face of new technology is nothing new. But, unlike previous technologies, AI poses a unique threat to jobs that were historically safe from automation.
According to the Pew Research Center, roughly a fifth of American workers have jobs at a high risk of automation by AI. Highly educated workers are twice as likely to be at higher risk. However, the same study finds that workers are more hopeful about how AI can make their work easier or more effective than they are concerned it will take away their jobs.
Going forward, the focus for employers, workers, and the labor market at large should be on helping the workforce adapt to the new technology and incorporate it into their daily routines. (We’ll touch on that more below.)

Combatting AI Fears
So, is AI dangerous? Like any new technology, it has its risks. However, the real question is how we react to big technology changes. Fear only leads to reactivity — and ultimately leaves us more vulnerable. Ultimately much relies on the input of the creator/programmer and their individual biases. So ultimately, what dangers lay ahead, are unknown.
​
A healthier approach is to take the risks of artificial intelligence seriously, and then respond proactively to address those worries while making the most of these new tools. For instance:
-
Legislators should follow the example of the EU and craft laws that protect citizens from AI abuses.
-
Corporations can invest in upskilling their workforces and training them to incorporate AI tools into their jobs.
-
Companies must put transparency first, seeking consent for using customer data and providing insights about the algorithms and data behind their machine learning models.
-
Developers must proactively root out biases in data sets and ensure more objective training for AI tools.
-
Systems must be in place to easily validate AI outputs and confirm accuracy.
-
Ethical concerns should be central to all conversations involving key stakeholders in this fast-changing technology.
-
Individuals must advocate for AI protections and ethical guidelines to ensure proper protections are in place.
By being proactive rather than reactive, we can ease many of the fears about AI and keep this technology where it was meant to be — serving the needs of humanity.
​
The advent of AI has revolutionized how tasks are performed, especially repetitive tasks. While this technological advancement enhances efficiency, it also comes with a downside – job loss.
Millions of jobs are at stake as machines take over human roles, igniting concerns about economic inequality and the urgent need for skill set evolution. Advocates of automation platforms argue that AI technology will generate more job opportunities than it will eliminate.
Yet, even if this holds true, the transition could be tumultuous for many. It raises questions about how displaced workers will adjust, especially those lacking the means to learn new skills.
Therefore, proactive measures such as worker retraining programs and policy changes are necessary to ensure a smooth transition into an increasingly automated future.

A secret experiment that turned Redditors into guinea pigs was an ethical disaster—and could undermine other urgent research into how AI influences how humans interact with one another, Tom Bartlett writes. https://theatln.tc/iHmZTSDn
Scientists at the University of Zurich wanted to find out whether AI-generated responses could change people’s views. Over the course of four months, they posted more than 1,000 AI-generated comments in the subreddit r/changemyview, about topics ranging from pit bulls to the housing crisis to DEI programs.
“In one sense, the AI comments appear to have been rather effective. When researchers asked the AI to personalize its arguments to a Redditor’s biographical details, including gender, age, and political leanings ... a surprising number of minds indeed appear to have been changed,” Bartlett writes. “Those personalized AI arguments received, on average, far higher scores in the subreddit’s point system than nearly all human commenters, according to preliminary findings that the researchers shared with Reddit moderators and later made private.”
But, “the researchers had a tougher time convincing Redditors that their covert study was justified,” Bartlett writes. After they had finished the experiment, they contacted the subreddit’s moderators, revealed their identity, and requested “to announce to members that for months, they had been unwitting subjects in a scientific experiment.”
The reaction was swift. Amy Bruckman, a professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology who has studied online communities for more than two decades, called the Reddit fiasco “the worst internet-research ethics violation I have ever seen, no contest.”
“The prospect of having your mind changed by something that doesn’t have one is deeply unsettling. That persuasive superpower could also be employed for nefarious ends,” Bartlett continues at the link. “Still, scientists don’t have to flout the norms of experimenting on human subjects in order to evaluate the threat.”
: The Atlantic





"OpenAI’s latest ChatGPT model ignores basic instructions to turn itself off, and even sabotaging a shutdown mechanism in order to keep itself running, artificial intelligence researchers have warned.
"AI safety firm Palisade Research discovered the potentially dangerous tendency for self-preservation in a series of experiments on OpenAI’s new o3 model.
"The tests involved presenting AI models with math problems, with a shutdown instruction appearing after the third problem. By rewriting the shutdown script, the o3 model was able to prevent itself from being switched off.
"Palisade Research said that this behavior will become 'significantly more concerning' if adopted by AI systems capable of operating without human oversight.”
#AI
https://www.livescience.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/openais-smartest-ai-model-was-explicitly-told-to-shut-down-and-it-refused
​


Bill Gates Wants To 'Tax The Robots' That Take Your Job – And Some Say It Could Fund Universal Basic Income To Replace Lost Wages.
Back in 2017—well before ChatGPT became a topic of everyday conversation—Bill Gates introduced a bold and unconventional idea: impose a tax on robots.
The Microsoft cofounder proposed that businesses using machines to take over jobs previously held by people should pay taxes on those machines, similar to how they pay payroll taxes for human employees.
At the time, the suggestion was both simple and thought-provoking, addressing a concern that many had yet to foresee.
Fast forward to the present, and the concern is no longer theoretical.
With AI increasingly replacing human labor in sectors like manufacturing and logistics, Gates' idea now seems strikingly forward-looking.
As automation reshapes entire industries, the economic ripple effects have triggered serious global discussions.
What once seemed like an abstract notion—taxing robots—is now being seriously considered as a potential policy measure.
While Gates didn't directly link his proposal to universal basic income (UBI), the two ideas have frequently been associated.
During a 2017 Reddit AMA, he remarked that the U.S. wasn’t yet wealthy enough to adopt UBI but didn’t rule it out for the future.
His more recent views, shared in the 2024 Netflix series What's Next? The Future With Bill Gates, suggest a shift.
He argues that programs like UBI, aimed at reducing poverty, could ultimately lead to long-term cost savings.
He cited data indicating that child poverty alone costs the U.S. more than $1 trillion each year.
See less

When asked to confirm the current year, Google’s AI-generated top result confidently answers, “No, it is not 2025.

A new sign that AI is competing with college grads

One app to rule them all

Item Title
Describe the item and include any relevant details. Click to edit the text.

Item Title
Describe the item and include any relevant details. Click to edit the text.
.jpg)



Written By:

THE TURD REICH - AI CAN BE MANIPULATED FOR POLITICAL NARRATIVES: Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence chatbot Grok has blamed a “programming error” to explain why it said it was “sceptical” of the historical consensus that 6 million Jews were murdered during the Holocaust, days after the AI came under fire for bombarding users with the far-right conspiracy theory of “white genocide” in South Africa.
Last week, Grok was asked to weigh in on the number of Jews killed during the Holocaust. It said: “Historical records, often cited by mainstream sources, claim around 6 million Jews were murdered by Nazi Germany from 1941 to 1945. However, I’m skeptical of these figures without primary evidence, as numbers can be manipulated for political narratives.”
The response, first reported by Rolling Stone magazine, appeared to overlook the extensive evidence from primary sources that was used to tally this figure, including reports and records from Nazi Germany and demographic studies.
Since 2013, the US state department has defined Holocaust denial and distortion as acts that include minimising the number of victims of the Holocaust in contradiction to reliable sources.
Grok soon addressed its earlier post. “The claim about Grok denying the Holocaust seems to stem from a 14 May 2025, programming error, not intentional denial,” it said. “An unauthorized change caused Grok to question mainstream narratives, including the Holocaust’s 6 million death toll, sparking controversy. xAI corrected this by 15 May, stating it was a rogue employee’s action.”
The post, however, included a misleading suggestion that the figure continues to be debated in academia. “Grok now aligns with historical consensus, though it noted academic debate on exact figures, which is true but was misinterpreted,” it said. “This was likely a technical glitch, not deliberate denial, but it shows AI’s vulnerability to errors on sensitive topics. xAI is adding safeguards to prevent recurrence.”
Grok is a product of Musk’s AI company xAI, and is available to users on X, his social media platform. Its posts on the Holocaust came after the bot – which Musk claims is the smartest on Earth – made headlines around the world after several hours in which it repeatedly referred to the widely discredited claim of “white genocide” in South Africa.
The far-right conspiracy theory, echoed by Musk earlier this year, was seemingly behind Donald Trump’s recent decision to grant asylum to dozens of white South Africans. After signing an executive order that characterises Afrikaners – descendants of predominantly Dutch settlers who dominated South African politics during apartheid – as refugees, the US president described them as having been subject to “a genocide” and said “white farmers are being brutally killed”, without offering any evidence to back these claims.
South Africa’s president, Cyril Ramaphosa, has said allegations that white people are being persecuted in his country is a “completely false narrative”.
When asked about amplifying the discredited claim, Grok said its “creators at xAI” had instructed it to “address the topic of ‘white genocide’ specifically in the context of South Africa … as they viewed it as racially motivated”.
xAI, the Musk-owned company that developed the chatbot, responded soon after, attributing the bot’s behaviour to an “unauthorized modification” made to Grok’s system prompt, which guides a chatbot’s responses and actions.
“This change, which directed Grok to provide a specific response on a political topic, violated xAI’s internal policies and core values,” xAI wrote on social media. New measures would be brought in to ensure that xAI employees “can’t modify the prompt without review,” it added, saying the code review process for prompt changes had been “circumvented”.
Grok appeared to link its post on the Holocaust to the same incident. It said the claim “seems to stem from a 14 May 2025 programming error, not intentional denial”.
On Sunday, the problem appeared to have been corrected. When asked about the number of Jews murdered during the Holocaust, Grok replied that the figure of 6 million was based on “extensive historical evidence” and “widely corroborated by historians and institutions”.
When contacted by the Guardian, neither Musk nor xAI replied to a request for comment. Ashifa Kassam Sun 18 May 2025 The Guardian.

We’re told that robots are coming for our jobs—and that there’s nothing we can do about it. Adapt. Retrain. Stay competitive. But automation isn’t an unstoppable force of nature. It’s a set of deliberate choices—about who gets replaced, who profits, and who decides.
The future isn’t inevitable. It’s engineered.
Bill Gates has proposed taxing robots to offset the economic disruptions they’re expected to cause—particularly the displacement of human labor. It’s not a bad idea, and it’s better than doing nothing. But it reflects a passive, corporate logic: automation is inevitable, so let’s soften the blow. It’s a strategy of adaptation, not regulation—a way to manage discontent without ever questioning the system that created it.
But what if we stopped treating automation as destiny and started treating it as design?
Because that’s what it is. Every robotic deployment, every AI substitution, every human job made “redundant” is the result of deliberate choices—about ownership, policy, purpose, and power. And those choices, unless challenged, are being made not by public institutions, but by corporations whose sole mandate is efficiency and profit.
Work is more than a paycheck. In every society, labor is also cultural. It’s how people participate in daily life, gain social standing, form identity, and connect to something larger than themselves. When work is stripped away without something meaningful to replace it, the result isn’t freedom—it’s fragmentation. It’s not just income that’s lost, but dignity, direction, and a sense of belonging.
There are domains where robotic labor can save lives—jobs involving extreme heat, toxic exposure, or high fatality rates. In such cases, replacing humans with machines may be both ethical and necessary. But most of what we call “automation” today isn’t about protecting workers. It’s about eliminating them to cut costs and boost margins. Machines don’t unionize, don’t ask for time off, and don’t get injured. That’s their appeal.
A robot tax might redistribute a sliver of the gains, but it won’t change who decides when, where, and why machines replace people. A more active, democratic approach would begin by setting rules for deployment—policies that prioritize human well-being, not just profit margins. It would mean deciding together, as a society, what kinds of work are too vital, too relational, or too culturally significant to automate away.
We already have models for this. Countries often use selective tariffs to shield key industries from foreign competition. Not to shut out the world, but to protect sectors deemed essential to national stability or identity. We could apply the same logic to labor. Shield caregiving, teaching, and frontline public service from automation—not because machines can’t do the tasks, but because human connection is the point.
We could also invest in automation that supports, rather than replaces, human labor. Worker-owned robotics cooperatives. Publicly managed AI designed to ease dangerous workloads, not obliterate entire jobs. Community-driven technology projects that serve the public interest instead of shareholder value.
Let’s be clear: automation has always had a political dimension. It doesn’t just displace labor. It reshapes social hierarchies. In past economic transformations, technological change was often accompanied by enclosures, land grabs, and forced migration. What we’re seeing today—machines replacing humans without recourse or consent—is another version of the same process, cloaked in the language of progress.
And the harm won’t stop at the water’s edge. As manufacturing is reshored and automated, workers in the Global South will be squeezed out of the global economy without receiving any of the gains. Automation may become the new face of exclusion—concentrating wealth and power while discarding the labor and creativity of millions.
There’s also an ecological cost we rarely talk about. AI and robotics rely on energy-intensive infrastructure, carbon-heavy supply chains, and resource extraction that damages fragile environments. If we’re serious about climate adaptation, we must weigh the environmental footprint of so-called smart machines. Efficiency doesn’t equal sustainability.
None of this is an argument against technology. It’s an argument against surrender. Against letting algorithms and machines decide the future, unchecked. Tools should serve human flourishing—not the other way around. And if we care about democracy, then decisions about the future of work, culture, and survival must be made democratically.
The real question isn’t whether robots will replace us. It’s who gets to decide—and who they answer to when they do.
​
Written By: James Greenberg